Quantcast


Twitter icon


Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Sponsored links

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

Religious intolerance in Canada

2013-SEP: Proposed Quebec Government's
restriction on some religious clothing & symbols
worn by "state personnel." (Continued).

Sponsored link



horizontal rule

This essay is a continuation of a previous essay

horizontal rule

Limits proposed by the Quebec Government on the wearing of religious clothing or symbolic objects by "state personnel:"

A main provision of the proposed Charter of Quebec Values would prohibit certain forms of personal religious expression. It is this part of the Charter that seems to have attracted almost all of the public and media attention.

It would require individuals to have their face uncovered when they go to a government office to apply for or receive government services.

It also restricts:

"... the wearing of overt and conspicuous religious symbols by state personnel in carrying out their duties. This restriction is intended to reflect the state’s neutrality. The employees in question would be :

  • personnel in ministries and organizations;

  • state personnel with power to impose sanctions (judges named by Québec, prosecutors, police officers, and correctional agents);

  • daycare (CPE) and private subsidized daycare personnel;

  • school board personnel, including those in public elementary and high schools;

  • ... [General and Vocational College], and university personnel;

  • public health network and social services personnel;

  • municipal personnel.

However, in the case of ... [General and Vocational Colleges], universities, public health institutions, social services institutions, and municipalities, the board of directors or municipal council could adopt a resolution allowing its personnel to wear such religious symbols. This authorization would be valid for a period up to five years and [be] renewable. It would not apply to the obligation of having one’s face uncovered ..." 1,2

Exemptions from the list of forbidden activities are:

  • Personal Christmas trees, which will be allowed in offices.

  • Elected officials and Members of the National Assembly are exempt from the dress code.

  • Private schools and non-subsidized day cares are also exempt.

  • The large crucifix over the Speaker's chair in the National Assembly will be retained as a "heritage" symbol.

  • The massive cross on the top of Mont Royale is also to be retained because of its heritage status. It is 31.4 m/103ft tall. 2

At first glance, many of the provisions of the proposed Quebec Charter violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms -- Canada's Constitution. Fortunately for the Quebec Government, the national charter isn't really worth the paper it is print on. It contains a "not withstanding" clause that specifies a procedure by which any province can overrule it by passing legislation that violates human rights clauses in the national charter.

horizontal rule
Sponsored link

horizontal rule

Examples of forbidden clothing and religious objects worn by civil servants:

Included are large crucifixexes typically worn by Roman Catholics, hijabs by Muslim women, turbans by Sikh men, niqabs by Muslim women, and kippahs (a.k.a. yarmulkes) by Jewish males as shown below:

Forbidden clothing and religious objects 1

Other variations of head coverings by Muslim civil service, including the Al-Amira, Burqa, Chandor, Khimar, and Shayla, would presumably also be banned. In addition, members of the public accessing a service from public servants would have to have their face exposed; wearing of a niqab or burka would be forbidden. 3

horizontal rule

Examples of religious rings, earrings, and symbols that the government would permit "state personnel" to wear:

Allowable clothing and religious objects 1

Note that religious symbols appear to be acceptable if their dimentions are sufficiently small. This would seem to imply that the religious expression police will have to be equipped with rulers and/or calipers. Manufacturers will probably start making rings, earrings, and other symbols that fall within the government's guidelines, and labelling them appropriately.

horizontal rule

This topic continues in the next essay.

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. "Limit the wearing of conspicuous religious symbols," Government of Quebec, undated, at: http://www.nosvaleurs.gouv.qc.ca  Available in French and partially in English
  2. "Quebec values: Christmas and crucixes are in; Hijabs? Not so much," The Montreal Gazette, 2013-SEP-10, at: http://blogs.montrealgazette.com/
  3. A display of Muslim head coverings used by women can be seen at "Muslim Veils — from Hijab to Burqa," Apologetics Index, 2012-NOV-19, at: http://www.apologeticsindex.org/


Site navigation:

HomeReligious Conflict etc > Religious Conflict > Canada > here

HomeHuman Rights >Religious Conflict etc > Religious Conflict > Canada > here

HomeReligious Conflict etc > Religious Conflict > Religious intolerance > Canada > here

Home >  Basic religious info > Canada > here

Home >  Basic religious info > Religion in Canada > Canada > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2013 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2013-OCT-02
Latest update: 2013-OCT-02
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link


Go to the previous page, or return to the "Religious intolerance in Canada" menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 
Sponsored links: