Quantcast


Twitter icon


Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Sponsored links

 

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

Domestic Partnerships &
Same-Sex Marriages (SSMs)
in Wisconsin

Menu:
2006 until now:
Bans added to state Constitution.
Limited domestic partnerships legalized.
Positive ruling in federal District Court.
Same-sex marriages available briefly.
Case appealed to 7th U.S. Court of Appeals.

Sponsored link.

marriage equality symbol Timeline of the struggle to attain marriage equality in Wisconsin:

  • 2006: Wisconsin voters amended the state constitution, by passing Referendum 1, with a vote of 59% to 41%. This banned both civil unions and marriages by same-sex couples.

  • 2009: Governor Jim Doyle (D) sponsored a bill to create a system of Domestic Partnerships in the state that would give registered same-sex couples a few of the benefits and protections given automatically to all married couples.

  • 2010: The constitutionality of Referendum 1 was challenged in state court, but was upheld by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

  • 2011: An attempt by a conservative group, Wisconsin Family Action, to have domestic partnerships declared unconstitutional failed. A poll in MAY shows that only 42% of Wisconsin voters favor same-sex marriages; 46% were opposed; 12% uncertain.

  • 2014-FEB: The lawsuit Wolf v. Walker was filed in a federal District Court to seek marriage equality in Wisconsin.

  • 2014-JUN-06: U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb issued a ruling finding that Referendum 1 is unconstitutional because it violates the due process and equal protection clauses in the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Judge Crabb did not immediately stay her ruling. As a result, about 550 same-sex couples were able to obtain marriage licenses and be married.

  • 2014-JUN-13: Judge Crabb did stay her ruling after having received briefs from the plaintiffs and defendants. The Attorney General appealed the case to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The status of the marriages made during the week between the ruling and stay is uncertain. Further developments may cause these newly married couples to be forcibly divorced against their will.

  • 2014-AUG-26: A randomly selected panel of three judges of the 7th U.S. Circuit of Appeals heard an appeal to overturn Wisconsin's ban of marriages by same-sex couples. They also head an appeal of a consolidated set of three lawsuits challenging Indiana's similar marriage ban. From the pointed questions asked by the judges, the Attorneys General may have failed to make their case against marriage equality.

  • More developments are inevitable.

Sponsored link:

Topic covered in this section:

  • Part 1: 2006 to 2011: Bans added to state Constitution. Limited domestic partnerships legalized. Poll about SSMs among voters.

  • Part 2: 2013-AUG to 2014-JUN: Illinois Governor Quinn urged adoption of SSMs. Lawsuit Wolf v. Walker launched in federal District Court. Results of a poll of voters.

  • Part 3: 2014-JUN: Court ruled SSM ban unconstitutional. Lack of consensus about SSM legality. Confusion reigns.

  • Part 4: 2014-JUN: Webmaster's comments. State begins to register SSMs. Confusion continues.

  • Part 5: 2014-JUN: More webmaster's comments. District Court Judge Crabb issues stay. Attorney General plans appeal.

  • Part 6: 2014-JUN: Reactions by religious and social conservatives.

  • Part 7: 2014-JUL/AUG: Attorney General appeals case to 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Court holds hearing.


Site navigation:

Home > Religious info. > Basic > Marriage > SSM > Menu >here

Home > "Hot" topics > Homosexuality > SSM > Menu > here

First posted: 2014-JUN-12
Latest update: 2014-JUN-16
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go to the previous page, or return to the Same-sex Marriages menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Hot, controversial topics

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 
Sponsored links: