Quantcast
About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitor essays
Our forum
New essays
Other site features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
.
CHRISTIANITY
Who is a Christian?
Shared beliefs
Handle change
Bible topics
Bible inerrancy
Bible harmony
Interpret Bible
Persons
Beliefs, creeds
Da Vinci code
Revelation, 666
Denominations
.
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Other spirituality
Cults and NRMs
Comparing religions

About all religions
Important topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handle change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
World's end
One true religion?
Seasonal topics
Science v. Religion
More info.

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality/ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten commandm'ts
Abortion
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Equal rights - gays & bi's
Gay marriage
Nudism
Origins of the species
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

INTELLIGENT DESIGN (ID):

OPINIONS ABOUT ID, mostly by scientists.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.


horizontal rule

Opinions favoring ID:

Belief is split over the validity of ID. A few high-profile scientists support ID and are doing active research in its support. The general scientific community dismisses ID as another form of creationism:

bulletMichael Behe, a biochemist at Lehigh University, author, 14 and leading proponent of ID said: "I think [ID] is making a lot of progress in the sense that it's now an active topic of conversation." 10
bulletJudge Robert H. Bork. an extreme conservative and strict constructionist judge said: "[Behe, a leader in the ID movement] has shown that Darwinism cannot explain life as we know it."  2
bulletPresident George W. Bush, during an media interview on 2005-AUG-01, made a brief comment favoring having schools teach ID "...so people can understand what the debate is about." He continued: "I think part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought. You’re asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, the answer is yes." 3

horizontal rule

Opinions critical of ID:

bulletScott Atran, anthropologist and psychologist, wrote: "Nothing indicates that people who believe that life arose by chance also believe that morality is haphazard." 5
bulletSam Clifford, a high-school biology teacher from Georgetown, TX, said: that intelligent design is "a piecemeal, haphazard concoction" that he does not have time for. 6
bulletJerry A. Coyne, evolutionary biologist, wrote:
bullet"Not only is ID markedly inferior to Darwinism at explaining and understanding nature but in many ways it does not even fulfill the requirements of a scientific theory."
bullet"The geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky famously declared, 'Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.' One might add that nothing in biology makes sense in the light of intelligent design."
bulletRichard Dawkins, leading evolutionary biologist, wrote:
bullet"Natural selection is not some desperate last resort of a theory. It is an idea whose plausibility and power hits you between the eyes with a stunning force, once you understand it in all its elegant simplicity"
bullet"The supernatural explanation fails to explain because it ducks the responsibility to explain itself."
bulletDaniel C. Dennett, a philosopher, wrote: "Evolutionary biology certainly hasn’t explained everything that perplexes biologists, but intelligent design hasn’t yet tried to explain anything at all."
bulletMarc D. Hauser, evolutionary psychologist wrote:
bullet"What counts as a controversy must be delineated with care, as we want students to distinguish between scientific challenges and sociopolitical ones."
bullet"Incredulity doesn’t count as an alternative position or critique."
bulletStuart A. Kauffman, theoretical biologist wrote: "To state that a given organ is so improbable that it requires design is just ill founded. The argument uses standard probability, which does not apply to the evolution of the biosphere."
bulletLeonard Krishtalka, director of the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History. Referring to ID, he said, "That's a religious belief, and science has no comment on that." Referring to the lack of understanding of the evolution of a living cell, Dr. Kristalka commented: "The absence of knowledge does not mean the answer is a supernatural creator." 4
bulletSteven Pinker, Psychologist, wrote: "An evolutionary understanding of the human condition, far from being incompatible with a moral sense, can explain why we have one." 5
bulletLisa Randall, physicist, wrote: "We don’t have an intelligent designer (ID), we have a bungling consistent evolver (BCE). Or maybe an adaptive changer (AC). In fact, what we have in the most economical interpretation is, of course, evolution."
bulletScott D. Sampson, paleontologist, wrote: "Rather than removing meaning from life, an evolutionary perspective can and should fill us with a sense of wonder at the rich sequence of natural systems that gave us birth and continues to sustain us."
bulletDr. John Staver, a professor at Kansas State University professor and co-chair of the committee that crafted the new science standards for Kansas public schools, described ID as a "fringe idea at the moment, and not one being discussed all that much in the scientific community." 4
bulletTim D. White, paleontologist, wrote: "A denial of evolution–however motivated–is a denial of evidence, a retreat from reason to ignorance." 5

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. Michael Behe, "Darwin's Black Box: The biochemical challenge to evolution," Touchstone Books, (1998). Read over 260 reviews or order this book safely from Amazon.com online book store
  2. Robert H. Bork, "Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline," Regan Books, (1996), Page 294.
  3. "Bush endorsement of 'Intelligent Design' in public schools is irresponsible, says Americans United," press release, Americans United, 2005-AUG-02.
  4. "Kansas board to restore evolution to curriculum, but new fight over 'Intelligent Design' expected," AANEWS, 2001-JAN-12.
  5. From the book review on the Amazon.com web site for John Brockman, "Intelligent Thought: Science versus the Intelligent Design Movement," Vintage Original, (2006). Read reviews or order this book safely from Amazon.com online book store.
  6. Jay Mathews, "Who's Afraid of Intelligent Design?," Washington Post, 2005-MAR-23, at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/

horizontal rule

Site navigation:

Home > "Hot" religious topics > Evolution & Creation Science > ID > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2006 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2006-MAY-10
Latest update: 2006-MAY-10
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)


horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or to the ID Menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.