Quantcast


Twitter icon


Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
 Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic...
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
10 commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

Sponsored links

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

The National Day of Prayer in the USA (NDP)

Menu

Court rules NDP is constitutional, but
government declaration of NDP isn't

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

Constitutionality of the NDP legislation:

The National Day of Prayer religious observances are legally protected under the free exercise of religion clause of the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Any individuals, congregations, or any other group can hold meetings to advocate prayer.

However, the constitutionality of the federal legislation that creates the NDP as a government sponsored observance is in doubt.

As we described in a separate essay, there are at least seven grounds under which it might be argued that legislation by the federal government, or a state or municipal government to create a National Day of Prayer (NDP) might be declared unconstitutional. In each case, the basis for declaring the legislation unconstitutional is the establishment clause of the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Literally interpreted, this clause merely states that the country shall have no official religion. As interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court, it means that a wall of separation shall exist between the government and religion.

On 2010-APR-15 a U.S. District Court judge ruled that the federal enabling legislation for the NDP was unconstitutional. That is, the right of individuals and groups to hold a NDP is very securely protected by the U.S. Constitution. The free exercise clause of the same amendment guarantees that. It is only the declaration of the NDP by the federal government that was found to be unconstitutional.

Without the government declaration sponsoring the National Day of Prayer, its official status is not like that of Martin Luther King Jr. Day; it is more like National Cookie Day: a privately organized observance without government sponsorship or recognition.

Over the years, organization of the NDP has been taken over by a non-governmental para-church group, the National Day of Prayer Task Force which has very strong ties to the fundamentalist Christian group Focus on the Family. They only recognize divisive NDP observances in which non-evangelicals and non-Christians are excluded from the podium. They continue to be quite free to continue the NDP on 2010-MAY-06 and on future first Thursdays in May. Similarly, other groups continue to be free to organize inclusive observations that contribute to religious harmony by welcoming Christians from all wings of the religion, and include followers of other religions. However, if the District Court's decision is upheld in the expected appeal, the Task Force will not have government sponsorship for the NDP.

horizontal rule

Topics covered in this section:

horizontal rule

Site navigation:

Home > Christianity > Christian history, etc > Prayer > NDP > here

Home > Christianity > History, beliefs... > Practices > Prayer > NDP > here

or Home > Spiritual topics > NDP > here

or Home > Religious information > NDP > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2010 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally published: 2010-APR-16
Most recent update: 2010-APR-17
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or to the National Day of Prayer menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 

 

Sponsored link: