Quantcast
About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitor essays
Our forum
New essays
Other site features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
.
CHRISTIANITY
Who is a Christian?
Shared beliefs
Handle change
Bible topics
Bible inerrancy
Bible harmony
Interpret Bible
Persons
Beliefs, creeds
Da Vinci code
Revelation, 666
Denominations
.
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Other spirituality
Cults and NRMs
Comparing religions

About all religions
Important topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handle change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
World's end
One true religion?
Seasonal topics
Science v. Religion
More info.

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality/ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten commandm'ts
Abortion
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Equal rights - gays & bi's
Gay marriage
Nudism
Origins of the species
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

INTERNET CENSORSHIP SOFTWARE PROGRAMS

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.

horizontal rule

Topics covered in this essay:

bulletDouble standard used?
bulletIs Your Favorite Site Banned?
bulletOur Opinions

horizontal rule

Double standard used?

Peacefire, a youth group opposed to Internet censorship, performed a "bait and switch" experiment in order to determine whether censorship programs treated small and large web sites equally. 1 They found that several censorship companies treated conservative Christian sites, such as the Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, the Official Dr. Laura web page and Concerned Women for America quite differently than small, personal web sites. They allow free access to the Christian web sites, even though those sites contain anti-gay material that met the blocking company's definition of hate speech. 2 Peacefire performed the following test:

bulletThey verified that none of the conservative Christian web sites were currently blocked by censorship programs.
bulletThey copied anti-gay material from the conservative Christian sites to new, personal web sites.
bulletThe new web sites were then submitted for review to Bess, Cyber Patrol, Net Nanny,  SmartFilter, SurfWatch, and WebSENSE via anonymous Email accounts.
bulletIn all cases, the blocking companies declared the new web sites to be hate speech; the sites were blocked.
bulletPeacefire then contacted the blocking companies and asked that the conservative Christian web sites also be blocked for disseminating hate material. The blocking companies refused the request.

This informal experiment appears to show that censorship companies do not block web sites on the basis of their hate content, as is their claim.

Other interesting developments:

bulletEnvirolink, a provider of web space to environmental and animal-rights groups, took legal action against Cyber Patrol for blocking access to their environmental and animal rights sites.
bulletComputer hackers successfully broke into the data bases of X-Stop and a few other block lists. They found that about 75% of sites that were blocked as porn sites were actually public interest charities or university education pages.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

Is your favorite site banned?

In 1997, the Netly News Network created quite a bit of interest on the Internet by developing a search facility for net-filtering programs. They had a program that allowed anyone to search five of the leading Net-filtering programs: CyberSitter, NetNanny, SurfWatch, The Internet Filter, and Cyber Patrol. You entered a domain name and it listed the files that were blocked. Unfortunately, this very useful program was discontinued. The Internet badly needs such a utility program today, so that Webmasters of controversial sites (or any site that is disliked by conservative religious folks) can check to see whether they are banned.

If this threat to freedom of speech scares you as much as it does us, you might want to contact:

bulletCyber Patrol: cybernot@microsys.com
bulletCleannet: info@iia-ca.org 
bulletCyberSitter: bmilburn@solidoak.com  
bulletNetNanny: gordonR@netnanny.com  
bulletBess Filtering Services: info@n2h2.com

horizontal rule

Our thoughts on blocking of Internet sites:

We feel that blocking software is a good thing, if it is used within the family to protect young children from the seamier side of the Web. However, we have major concerns:

bulletWhen it is used in public libraries in a way that restricts access by adults or older teens to the Internet.
bulletWhen it is used by parents to block access by older teenage members of the family.
bulletWhen it is used throughout a school system, blocking access for students of all ages.
bulletWhen the censor board arbitrarily bans sites because of the board's religious prejudices. Some companies that make blocking software have arbitrarily blocked all Neopagan sites, or sites that disseminate safe sex practices, or sites that offer support to gays and lesbians, etc.
bulletWhen sites are placed on a banned list without the Webmaster of the site being informed
bulletWhen there is no convenient way for a Webmaster to determine whether her/his site has been blocked
bulletWhen the blocking company does not publish their precise and accurate criteria for censorship
bulletWhen the blocking company does not treat all web sites equally, but allows access to certain types of hate literature on some sites.

We feel that, as a minimum, a Webmaster should be able to go to a URL belonging to a company that makes blocking software, enter a domain name, and find out if any of the files at the Webmaster's site are blocked by that company.

horizontal rule

Related link:

bulletLaws restricting Internet content

horizontal rule

References:

  1. A description of Peacefire's experiment is at: http://www.peacefire.org/BaitAndSwitch/ 
  2. A description of the hate speech definitions used by various blocking companies is at: http://www.peacefire.org/BaitAndSwitch/definitions.html 

horizontal rule

Copyright  © 1998 to 2002 incl. by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2002-SEP-16
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)

horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or return to the lnternet censorship menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.