Quantcast
About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Your first visit?
Contact us
External links
Good books
Visitor essays
Our forum
New essays
Other site features
Buy a CD
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
.
CHRISTIANITY
Who is a Christian?
Shared beliefs
Handle change
Bible topics
Bible inerrancy
Bible harmony
Interpret Bible
Persons
Beliefs, creeds
Da Vinci code
Revelation, 666
Denominations
.
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Other spirituality
Cults and NRMs
Comparing religions

About all religions
Important topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handle change
Doubt/security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
World's end
One true religion?
Seasonal topics
Science v. Religion
More info.

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality/ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten commandm'ts
Abortion
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment
Equal rights - gays & bi's
Gay marriage
Nudism
Origins of the species
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking kids
Stem cells
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

 THE TEN COMMANDMENTS

Exactly what is involved in
the "Judge Moore" conflict?

horizontal rule

Sponsored link.


horizontal rule

Read about the Chief Justice Moore case:
up to 2003-JUL, 2003-AUG, the rest of 2003, 2004 and after

horizontal rule

horizontal rule

Quotation:

bullet"You have not shown any trace of respect for the rights of minority religions to operate with a religiously unbiased court system. And that is the root of this discussion. All else is distraction." Excerpt from a posting to a Beliefnet discussion board, 2003-AUG-25.
bullet"Let's get one thing straight, this is about acknowledging God." Chief Justice Roy Moore.
bullet"In this country, no individual or group, no matter how large or powerful, can decree what religious ideals are to be held sacred for the rest of society." Michael Newdow 1

horizontal rule

The Ten Commandments and the U.S. Constitution:

The Ten Commandments (a/k/a. Decalogue) can be freely displayed almost anywhere in the U.S.: in and around private homes, in businesses, in offices, etc. However, it cannot be shown by itself in public parklands, government offices, public schools, etc. With very few exceptions, courts have repeatedly ruled that if the Decalogue cannot be shown in isolation. That would be a violation of the principle of separation of church and state which is contained within the establishment clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The separation principle involved three concepts:

bulletGovernments cannot promote one religion over another.
bulletGovernments cannot promote a religious lifestyle over a secular lifestyle.
bulletGovernments cannot promote a secular lifestyle over a religious lifestyle.

Placing the Ten Commandments in a public school room or in the rotunda of a Justice Building would violate the first two of the above criteria: It would promote Judaism and Christianity over other religions. (Recall that almost half of the Ten Commandments refer to the necessity of worshiping Yahweh alone.) Its presence in a government building would also promote a religious lifestyle over a secular lifestyle. It would also give the impression that the courts are Judeo-Christian institutions. Non-Judeo-Christians might well be concerned about the possibility of them receiving justices at the hands of such courts.

However, the exhibition of the Decalogue would be constitutional if it appears as one element in a cultural display -- a grouping of religious and secular legal documents.

In most cases, court rulings are respected and implemented quickly. However, after Chief Justice Roy Moore he was ordered to remove the granite monument containing the Decalogue in the Justice Building in Mongomery, AL, he refused to comply.

horizontal rule

Why does the U.S. Constitution require separation of church and state?

Briefly, when the Constitution was written, its authors were well aware of the evils and massive loss of human life that had been experienced in Europe in prior centuries because of inter- and intra-religious conflict. They reasoned that the best way to avoid importing religiously-based hatred, oppression, mass murder and genocide into the New World was to separate church and state, religion and government, into two separate entities with a minimum of interaction.

bulletThose who support the separation of church and state have concluded that the arrangement has made governments, religious organizations and the culture much stronger:
bulletThe U.S. is certainly the most religious large country in the developed West. Christianity has largely failed in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Europe, as measured by public belief and church attendance.
bulletAmerica has avoided the type of massive disruptions and loss of life experienced in recent decades during religious conflicts in Northern Ireland, Bosnia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Cyprus, Nigeria, Sudan, Middle East, Iraq/Iran, Afghanistan, India, Sri Lanka, Philippines, etc.
bulletThe U.S. is generally regarded as the most religiously diverse country in the world. The percentage of individuals who identify themselves as Christians is dropping by almost one percentage point per year. Some feel that the separation of church and state is the best policy to minimize future inter-religious conflicts as the country becomes even more secular and religiously diverse.
bulletThose who oppose the separation of church and state point out that:
bulletAmerica was founded as a Christian state by Christian politicians.
bulletA substantial majority, about 75%, of its citizens are Christians.
bulletChristian theological and moral beliefs, shared by most of its citizens, adds great stability to the nation.
bulletWe should acknowledge the country's Christian heritage by having students recite prayer in schools, displaying the Ten Commandments, opening sessions of municipal, state and federal governments with Christian prayers, including "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, including "In God We Trust" as the National Motto, etc.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

What are Chief Justice Moore's legal arguments?

He has argued that:

  1. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution does not apply to the actions of state officials. This was initially true. The First Amendment was originally written to limit only the powers of Congress. In fact the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment starts: "Congress shall make no law...." However the U.S. Supreme Court has traditionally interpreted the Amendment as also applying to "other branches of government and government officials." 2 The Supreme Court has held for many decades that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which was passed after the Civil War, widens the application of the First Amendment to include all state and local governments.
  2. The presence of the Ten Commandments monument in the rotunda of the Justice Building is constitutional. i.e. it does not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Numerous court decisions, including some by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals -- the court that ordered Chief Justice Moore to remove the monument -- have established that the Ten Commandments is a religious document. If it is displayed by itself in a public school or in a federal, state or municipal government building, or on government property anywhere, it violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment because it has no secular purpose. Thus, the presence of the monument in the building rotunda is unconstitutional. Chief Justice Moore appears to have acknowledged that the monument has no secular purpose. At a recent rally he said: "This case is not about a monument and not about politics. Itís about the acknowledgement of God." In his closing arguments before the 11th Circuit Court, he said: "Can the state acknowledge God?í ... Indeed, we must acknowledge God because our constitution says our justice system is established upon God. For him to say that I canít say who God is, is to disestablish the justice system of this state." 3

    The courts have also established that the Ten Commandments can legally form part of a cultural display if it is combined with documents and artifacts from a variety of religions and from secular sources. But it seems to have been the intent of Chief Justice Moore to display the monument in isolation, perhaps implying that it is the sole origin of America's laws.
  3. The Federal Courts, specifically the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, does not have the authority to order him, as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama, to remove the monument. This argument recalls the conflict in Little Rock, AR, when Governor Faubus blocked the door of a school house, attempting to impose state law in contradiction of a court order to integrate the schools. He, and the governors of some other Southern states, argued that the federal courts had no authority to order them to desegregate their schools. "In each case, the courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court disagreed, principally relying upon the supremacy clause of the Constitution. That clause makes federal law supreme over conflicting state law." 2

While Chief Justice Moore's arguments may gain a great deal of support among fellow Southerners who might wish that they are valid, it is extremely unlikely that any would be accepted by an American court today.

horizontal rule

Who is involved in the conflict?

The conflict over the Ten Commandments monument appears to be fueled by many factions:

bulletThose who feel that the government, including its schools and courts, should acknowledge in concrete ways that America was founded by Christians on Christian principles, and that it remains a Christian country.
bulletThose who feel that the principle of Separation of Church and State is an important component of the U.S. Constitution and is our greatest hope for future religious peace in the country.
bulletThose who celebrate the religious freedom and religious diversity of the United States -- the ability of each citizen to follow the religion of their choice.
bulletThose who feel an obligation to obey the laws of the land, even if this is in conflict with their need to grant public recognition to their God and their God's laws.

horizontal rule

Exactly what principles are involved in the conflict?

It is important to understand precisely what is involved in this case:

bulletIt is not about preventing the public from freely viewing the The Commandments. There are literally thousands of locations in Montgomery where the monument could be legally installed for all to see: on church grounds, commercial land, private parks, etc.
bulletIt is not about preventing the monument from being located in the Justice Building. Judge Thompson of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has allowed it to be relocated from the rotunda to a different location in the building.
bulletIt is entirely about:
bulletWhether the monument can be located specifically in the rotunda of the Justice Building, the main focal point of the structure.
bulletWhether the law of the land should command greater allegiance from its citizens than their belief in publicly recognizing the supremacy of Yahweh.

horizontal rule

What does the Bible say about obeying governments and courts?

Jerry Falwell, and other speakers at the 2003-AUG rally appear to recommend that Judge Moore and the public at large refuse to obey the rulings of the court. The Montgomery Advertiser, in its coverage of the rally, noted: "A common belief among people interviewed at the rally was that Moore has a right to civilly disobey a federal judge's orders if they (sic) believe God's law is supreme." This belief appears to conflict with several passages in the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) and Christian Scriptures (New Testament) which state that it is a citizen's duty to obey the magistrate:

bulletProverbs 28:12: "Those who forsake the law praise the wicked, but those who keep the law resist them."
bulletRomans 13:1-4: "Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For he is the minister of God to thee for good...."
bullet1 Peter 2:13-14: "Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme; Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well."
bulletTitus 3:1: "Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work..."

On another note, Exodus 20:4 states: "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth." This is the first of the Ten Commandments, according to Roman Catholic church and some Lutheran denominations. It is the second Commandment according to other Christian denominations and Jews. A good case can be made that the monument installed by Chief Justice Moore can be considered a religious "graven image." It is a likeness of the Bible -- a "thing" that is on the earth. It is ironic that the creation of a monument to the Ten Commandments may be considered forbidden by one of the Ten Commandments.

horizontal rule

Reference used:

  1. Michael Newdow, "Judge Roy Moore deserves Jail," Beliefnet.com, 2003-AUG, at: http://www.beliefnet.com/
  2.  M. Casey Mattox, "Why Roy Moore Lost. Is the removal of the monument the tragedy that some will consider it?," Rutherford Institute, at:  http://www.beliefnet.com/
  3. "Alabama Attorney General attempts Coup D'ťtat against Chief Justice Moore," Vision forum, 2003-AUG-20, at: http://www.visionforum.com/

horizontal rule

Related essays on this site

bulletDevelopments involving posting of the Ten Commandments:
bulletA detailed analysis of the Ten Commandments
bulletRecent U.S. court rulings on separation of church and state
bulletThe Istook Constitutional Amendment: 1995-1996
bulletThe Istook Constitutional Amendment: 1997-1999
bulletPrayer in the public schools

horizontal rule

Site navigation: Home page > Religious LawsTen Commandments > here

horizontal rule

Copyright © 2003 & 2004 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Originally written: 2002-AUG-24
Latest update: 2004-AUG-08
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)


horizontal rule

Go to the previous page, or to the Ten Commandments menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?


Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.