Quantcast


Twitter icon


Facebook icon

About this site
About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Buy a CD of this site
Vital notes

World religions
BUDDHISM
CHRISTIANITY
Christian def'n
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Persons
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
 Denominations
HINDUISM
ISLAM
JUDAISM
WICCA / WITCHCRAFT
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs
Atheism
Agnosticism
Humanism
Other

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Quotes
Movies
Confusing terms
Glossary
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Spiritual/ethics
Spirituality
Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Peace/conflict
Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Cloning
Death penalty
Environment

Same-sex marriage

Homosexuality
Human rights
Gays in the military
Nudism
Origins
Sex & gender
Sin
Spanking
Stem cells
Transexuality
Women-rights
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news
Sponsored links

 

 

!!!!!!!! Search error!  If the URL ends something like .htm/  or .htm# delete the character(s) after .htm and hit return.

Abortion in the U.S.

South Dakota: 2006 anti-
abortion law and 2008 initiative

Sponsored link.


Abortion in South Dakota:

About 825 abortions are performed yearly in South Dakota.

Bill HB 1215 was introduced into the legislature with the intent of triggering the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn of Roe v. Wade. It was signed into law by Governor Mike Rounds (R) 2006-MAR-06  

It criminalized almost all abortions in the state. Only abortions necessary to save the life of the woman were allowed. It containrd no exceptions to permit abortions in the case of rape or incest. It did not allow an exception to prevent serious and/or permanent disability to the woman.

The law prohibited termination of human life at any time after conception. That is, once conception has occurred, childbirth is compulsory, unless a miscarriage happens.  The wording of the law appears to be ambiguous on the topic of emergency contraception (EC). Arguments can be made that the law either criminalizes or allows EC. The section of the law that appears at first glance to permit EC may in fact be a stealth clause that prohibits it.

Normally, the law would have taken effect in 2006-JUL. However, pro-choice forces raised sufficient signatures to delay implementing the law until the public was able to vote on the issue during the mid-term elections on 2006-NOV-07. The law was defeated by a clear majority and is now dead in the water.

Pro-life groups then had Initiated Measure 11 on the 2008 ballot. It was more moderate than HB 1215; it had rape, incest, health and death clauses. It was also defeated by a clear majority of voters and is also dead in the water.

It appears that the pro-life groups in South Dakota miscalculated the mood of the state's voters. Their cause would have been better served by promoting legislation in a more conservative state whose electorate was less pro-choice.

Topics covered in this section:

bulletIntroduction; passage of the South Dakota anti-abortion bill HB 1215:

bulletReactions to the bill's passage

bulletPublic reaction; Campaign; Public vote to suspend law

bulletDoes the law permit or criminalize emergency contraception (EC)?
 
bulletAnother try: Initiated Measure 11

Related essays on this web site:

bulletAnti-abortion bills in various states
bulletLaws restricting abortion in the U.S. and Canada
bulletRoe v. Wade: Its basis; court philosophies; political aspects
bulletThe future battle over women's access to abortion; The impact if Roe v. Wade is overturned

Site navigation:

 Home page > "Hot" topics > Abortion > Legal aspects > here

Copyright ? 2006 by Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
Latest update: 2006-OCT-08
Author: B.A. Robinson

line.gif (538 bytes)


Go to the previous page, or return to the "Legal aspects of abortion" menu, or choose:

Google
Web ReligiousTolerance.org

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Purchase a CD of this web site

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

 

Sponsored link: